![]() 07/08/2018 at 14:23 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
The problem with the FCA Pentastar engine is the name... Pentastar... Penta... which means FIVE... not SIX. On top of that, the cylinders are not arranged in a star pattern, but a vee pattern:
.
.
.
.
.
.
Thus, the engine associated with that name is all wrong. A suitable engine with the Pentastar name would be this:
Thus what FCA MUST do is redesign the Pentastar so it is a 5 cyl radial engine.
OR rename it to ‘Hexa-V-a-reeno’
![]() 07/08/2018 at 14:34 |
|
but its not...its named because...
Whatever. Good take.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 14:52 |
|
New rule: every manufacturer needs an engine that looks like their logo.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 15:05 |
|
Considering the quality of FCA products, I would never trust any radial engine they produced.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 15:13 |
|
Even then, “Pentastar” is a terrible name because it does nothing to distinguish itself apart from any other Chrysler engine . Any Chrysler engine could theoretically qualify for that title . It would be like Chevy introducing a new line of engines called “Bowtie”, while continuing to also use Chevy-branded non-“Bowtie” engines.
It’s also kind of a one-time use thing. Now that Ferrari has a car that is essentially named “THE Ferrari”, all other Ferraris are allegedly less of a Ferrari than this “now and forevermore definitive Ferrari”. It’s stupid. They could continue to use that name on a second generation of that car, and improve its performance, but the name implies that they will never make anything better than a LaFerrari.
“EcoBoost” is an awful name too, but at least it does something to imply forced induction. It’s marginally better than naming a line of engines “Blue Oval”.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 15:18 |
|
I prefer ‘Ecoboost’ over the lame-assed ‘InTech’ name used in on some V8 Lincolns like the FWD V8 Continental.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 15:22 |
|
I assumed ( for an embarrassingly long time) that Pentastar engines probably had five valves per cylinder, and that if you looked at the head from a certain angle, you would see some kind of star pattern. But no, the closest thing I see to any such pattern is the shape of t he block. Lame.
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
![]() 07/08/2018 at 15:32 |
|
Ugh, “InTech”. Was that supposed to be some sort of reference to its having separate INTAKE cams ? That’s the best excuse that I can come up with .
![]() 07/08/2018 at 15:43 |
|
I don’t know about that. FIAT at least has had quite a bit of experience with radials in their history.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 16:36 |
|
The problem is that, like all Chrysler products,
it’s not 5-star quality
![]() 07/08/2018 at 17:08 |
|
Nah, it had a different name, phoenix
, but there was a company of the same name that sued, so they used their logo instead.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 17:10 |
|
MIND BLOWN! BHEWWWW!!!!
![]() 07/08/2018 at 18:00 |
|
Eco boost is a great name- for their regular cars. Not sure why they put it on their performance cars.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 18:46 |
|
The “boost” part is fine, but I find the “eco” bit too eyeroll-inducing. I’m sure that this line of engines is much more efficient than older Ford engines in many ways, and thus one could argue that
eco
stands for
economy
. But that leafy logo is trying too hard to imply
eco-friendliness
, and the whole thing starts to smell too much like marketing bullcrap.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 18:58 |
|
I took it as a way to sell turbos as efficient to the masses instead of just performance. Considering all the things they could have gone with I think its a success
![]() 07/08/2018 at 21:52 |
|
it was originally named “Phoenix” (as in rising from the ashes of Daimler’s destruction) but there was a trademark issue.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 21:54 |
|
it was originally called “TwinForce” in the 2007 Lincoln MKR concept . neither the name nor the concept made it to production. but the fact that the “TwinForce” was a 3.5 liter, twin turbo, DI V6 in 2007 should tell you how long the industry works on stuff before releasing it.
![]() 07/08/2018 at 21:56 |
|
We need some more twin turbo v6s in the world. V6 is the most under-appreciated engine.
![]() 07/18/2018 at 19:56 |
|
Whereas, this is aply named, and when I first saw the diagram it blew my mind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napier_Deltic
Saw it on the BBC Four / Timeshift 2015 program The Engine That Powers the World: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06csy8c
![]() 07/18/2018 at 20:05 |
|
Ford: needs an oval somewhere in the engine
Chevy: plus-shaped engine (X shaped radial maybe?)
Dodge: they’re screwed (or maybe they can make a slanted inline 2?)
![]() 07/19/2018 at 09:09 |
|
It also had two intake runners for each cylinder, one short and one long with a butterfly to help switch between the two.
Deleting the Intake Manifold Runner Control is a popular mod for the early 4.6 DOHC engines, but it does affect low RPM response.
![]() 07/19/2018 at 09:11 |
|
“Pentastar”
I think it’s a throwback to the old logo:
Otherwise, it’s just a cool meaningless word.
![]() 07/19/2018 at 09:32 |
|
How’sabout Hexavee Six? lol
![]() 07/19/2018 at 09:41 |
|
“It’s also kind of a one-time use thing. Now that Ferrari has a car that is essentially named “THE Ferrari”, all other Ferraris are allegedly less of a Ferrari than this”
I was just thinking... wouldn’t that mean that all other Ferraris are now technically Dinos?